EDUCATION & LEARNING · HIGHER EDUCATION · COURSE

Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative AI

A reviewed pathway for replacing detector-centered academic-integrity practices with transparent expectations, evidence-centered assessment, proportionate review, learner explanation, and accountable human judgment.

08Evidence
  • Reason
  • Evidence
  • Reflect

Higher Education collection Responsible AI & Academic Integrity

Status: Reviewed faculty pathway

Version: 1.0.0

Estimated time: 135 minutes

Completion record: Created only after independent review approval.

Credential pathway: A reviewed completion may be separately authorized for a Logos Professional reviewed-completion credential. Enrollment or course completion alone does not guarantee issuance.

EVIDENCE MODEL

How the pathway turns learning into reviewable evidence

01Learn
02Apply
03Demonstrate
04Review
05Verify

Learning objectives

  • Distinguish academic-integrity concerns from uncertainty about authorship or tool use.
  • Define transparent and assignment-specific expectations for generative AI assistance.
  • Evaluate concerns using relevant evidence rather than treating probabilistic detection as proof.
  • Design proportionate, educationally defensible review and response processes.

Learning sequence

  1. Diagnostic reflection
  2. Five reviewed instructional lessons
  3. Structured integrity-case analysis
  4. Academic-integrity protocol
  5. Implementation reflection
  6. Deterministic rubric suggestion

Required evidence

  • Learning objective and intended outcome
  • Initial design or decision
  • Key distinction, standard, or boundary
  • Evidence and justification
  • Strongest objection, limitation, or failure mode
  • Revision made in response
  • Implementation or facilitation plan
  • Fairness, accessibility, or inclusion consideration
  • Evidence used to evaluate success

Certificate requirements

  • Acknowledge the course disclosure and complete the formative diagnostic.
  • Complete every reviewed lesson check in this published course version.
  • Submit the structured reasoning exercise, applied professional artifact, and implementation reflection.
  • Receive independent human review approval against the published rubric.
  • Receive separate administrator issuance of a Logos Professional Certificate of Completion.

The certificate verifies Logos Professional's reviewed-completion record only. It is not automatic institutional PD, CE, CEU, academic credit, licensure credit, or employer recognition.

What this certificate demonstrates

A named learner completed this published pathway, submitted authentic evidence, and received the required independent human review under the stated version and rubric.

Evidence base

The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity

International Center for Academic Integrity · International Center for Academic Integrity · 3rd edition (2021)

Frames academic integrity around honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage rather than enforcement alone.

REVIEWED

Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research

UNESCO · United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization · 2023

Supports human-centered governance, transparency, privacy, learner agency, and educational validation of generative-AI use.

REVIEWED
Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative AI · Logos Professional